2023年6月24日发(作者:)
Supplementary ExercisesI. Decide whether each of the following statements is True or False:
1. Both semantics and pragmatics study how speakers of a language use sentences to effect successful
communication
2. Pragmatics treats the meaning of language as something intrinsic and inherent.
3. It would be impossible to give an adequate description of meaning if the context of language use was left
unconsidered.
4. What essentially distinguishes semantics and pragmatics is whether in the study of meaning the context of use
is considered.
5. The major difference between a sentence and an utterance is that a sentence is not uttered while an utterance is.
6. The meaning of a sentence is abstract, but context-dependent.
7. The meaning of an utterance is decontexualized, therefore stable.
8. Utterances always take the form of complete sentences
9. Speech act theory was originated with the British philosopher John Searle.
10. Speech act theory started in the late 50’s of the 20th century.
11. Austin made the distinction between a constative and a performative.
12. Perlocutionary act is the act of expressing the speakerII.
’s in each blank below with one word which begins with the letter given:
13. P_________ is the study of how speakers of a language use sentences to effect successful communication.
14. What essentially distinguishes s_______ and pragmatics is whether in the study of meaning the context of
use is considered.
15. The notion of c_________ is essential to the pragmatic study of language.
16. If we think of a sentence as what people actually utter in the course of communication, it becomes an
u___________.
17. The meaning of a sentence is a_______, and decontexualized.
18. C________ were statements that either state or describe, and were thus verifiable.
19. P________ were sentences that did not state a fact or describe a state, and were not verifiable.
20. A l_________ act is the act of uttering words, phrases, clauses. It is the act of conveying literal meaning by
means of syntax, lexicon and phonology.
21. An i__________ act is the act of expressing the speaker’intention; s it is the act performed in saying
something.
22. A c_________ is commit the speaker himself to some future course of action.
23. An e________ is to express feelings or attitude towards an existing state.
24. There are four maxims under the cooperative principle: the maxim of q_______, the maxim of quality, the —maxim of relation and the maxim of manner.
III. There are four choices following each statement. Mark the choice that can best complete the statement:25. _________ does not study meaning in isolation, but in context.
A. Pragmatics
C. Sense relation
B. Semantics
D. Concept
26. The meaning of language was considered as something _______ in traditional semantics.
A. contextual
C. intrinsic
B. behaviouristic
D. logical
27. What essentially distinguishes semantics and pragmatics is whether in the study of meaning _________ is
considered.
A. reference
C. practical usage
B. speech act
D. context
28. A sentence is a _________ concept, and the meaning of a sentence is often studied in isolation.
A. pragmatic
C. mental
B. grammatical
D. conceptual
29. If we think of a sentence as what people actually utter in the course of communication, it becomes a(n)
_________.
A. constative
C. utterance
B. directive
D. expressive
30. Which of the following is true?
A. Utterances usually do not take the form of sentences.
B. Some utterances cannot be restored to complete sentences.
C. No utterances can take the form of sentences.
D. All utterances can be restored to complete sentences.
31. Speech act theory did not come into being until __________.
A. in the late 50B. in the early 1950C. in the late 1960’s of the 20the century
’s
’s
D. in the early 21st century.
32. __________ is the act performed by or resulting from saying something; it is the consequence of, or the change
brought about by the utterance.
A. A locutionary act
C. A perlocutionary act
欢迎下载B. An illocutionary act
D. A performative act
2 33. According to Searle, the illocutionary point of the representative is ______.
A. to get the hearer to do something
B. to commit the speaker to something’s being the case
C. to commit the speaker to some future course of action
D. to express the feelings or attitude towards an existing state of affairs.
34. All the acts that belong to the same category share the same purpose, but they differ __________.
A. in their illocutionary acts.
B. in their intentions expressed
C. in their strength or force
D. in their effect brought about
35. __________ is advanced by Paul Grice
A. Cooperative Principle
B. Politeness Principle
C. The General Principle of Universal Grammar
D. Adjacency Principle
36. When any of the maxims under the cooperative principle is flouted, _______ might arise.
A. impoliteness B. contradictions
C. mutual understanding D. conversational implicatures
I. Decide whether each of the following statements is True or False:
l. F 2. F 3.T 4.T 5.F 6.F 7.F 8.F 9.F 10.T 11.T 12.F
II. Fill in each blank below with one word which begins with the letter given:
13. Pragmatics 14. semantics 15. context 16. utterance 17. abstract
tives 19. Performatives 20. locutionary 21. illocutionary
22. commissive 23. expressive 24. quantity
III. There are four choices following each statement. Mark the choice that can best complete the
欢迎下载—3 —statement:
25. A 26.C 27.D 28.B 29.C 30.B
31.A 32.C 33.B 34.C 35. A 36.D
IV. Define the terms below:37. pragmatics 38. context 39. utterance meaning
42. performative
45. perlocutionary act 46.. Cooperative Principle
40. sentence meaning 41. constative
43. locutionary act 44. illocutionary act
V. Answer the following questions as comprehensively as possible. Give examples for illustration if
necessary:
47. How are semantics and pragmatics different from each other?
48. How does a sentence differ from an utterance?
49. How does a sentence meaning differ from an utterance meaning?
50. Discuss in detail the locutionary act, illocutionary act and perlocutionary act.
51. Searle classified illocutionary act into five categories. Discuss each of them in detail with examples.
52. What are the four maxims under the cooperative principle?
53. How does the flouting of the maxims give rise to conversational implicatures?
Suggested answers to supplementary exercises:
IV. Define the terms below:
37. pragmatics: Pragmatics can be defined as the study of how speakers of a language use sentences to effect
successful communication.
38. Context: Generally speaking, it consists of the knowledge that is shared by the speaker and the hearer. The
shared knowledge is of two types: the knowledge of the language they use, and the knowledge about the world,
including the general knowledge about the world and the specific knowledge about the situation in which linguistic
communication is taking place.
39. utterance meaning: the meaning of an utterance is concrete, and context-dependent. Utterance is based on
sentence meaning; it is realization of the abstract meaning of a sentence in a real situation of communication, or
simply in a context.
40. sentence meaning: The meaning of a sentence is often considered as the abstract, intrinsic property of the
sentence itself in terms of a predication.
欢迎下载4 —41. Constative: Constatives were statements that either state or describe, and were verifiable ;
42. Performative: performatives, on the other hand, were sentences that did not state a fact or describe a state, and
were not verifiable. Their function is to perform a particular speech act.
43. locutionary act: A locutionary act is the act of uttering words, phrases, clauses. It is the act of conveying literal
meaning by means of syntax, lexicon and phonology.
44. illocutionary act: An illocutionary act is the act of expressing the speaker's intention; it is the act performed in
saying something.
45. perlocutionary act: A perlocutionary act is the act performed by or resulting from saying something; it is the
consequence of, or the change brought about by the utterance; it is the act performed by saying something.
46. Cooperative Principle: It is principle advanced by Paul Grice. It is a principle that guides our conversational
behaviours. The content is : Make your conversational contribution such as is required at the stage at which it
occurs by the accepted purpose or the talk exchange in which you are engaged.
V. Answer the following questions as comprehensively as possible. Give examples for illustration if necessary:
47. How are semantics and pragmatics different from each other?
Traditional semantics studied meaning, but the meaning of language was considered as something intrinsic, and
inherent, i.e. a property attached to language itself. Therefore, meanings of words, meanings of sentences were all
studied in an isolated manner, detached from the context in which they were used. Pragmatics studies meaning not
in isolation, but in context. The essential distinction between semantics and pragmatics is whether the context of
use is considered in the study of meaning . If it is not considered, the study is restricted to the area of traditional
semantics; if it is considered, the study is being carried out in the area of pragmatics.
48. How does a sentence differ from an utterance?
A sentence is a grammatical concept. It usually consists of a subject and predicate. An utterance is the unit of
communication. It is the smallest linguistic unit that has a communicative value. If we regard a sentence as what
people actually utter in the course of communication, it becomes an utterance. Whether “Mary isentence or an utterance depends on how we look at it. If we regard it as a grammatical unit or a self-contained unit
in isolation, then it is a sentence. If we look at it as something uttered in a certain situation with a certain purpose,
then it is an utterance. Most utterances take the form of complete sentences, but some utterances are not, and some
cannot even be restored to complete sentences.
49. How does a sentence meaning differ from an utterance meaning?
A sentence meaning is often considered as the intrinsic property of the sentence itself in terms of a predication.
It is abstract and independent of context. The meaning of an utterance is concrete, and context-dependent. The
utterance meaning is based on sentence meaning; it is realization of the abstract meaning of a sentence in a real
situation of communication, or simply in a context. For example,
欢迎下载“There is a dog at the dooreaker could
5 —utter it as a matter- of- fact statement, telling the hearer that the dog is at the door. The speaker could use it as a
warning, asking the hearer not to approach the door. There are other possibilities, too. So, the understanding of the
utterance meaning of “There is a dog at the doorpends on the context in which it is uttered and the purpose for ” dewhich the speaker utters it.
50. Discuss in detail the locutionary act, illocutionary act and perlocutionary act.
A locutionary act is the act of uttering words, phrases, clauses. It is the act of conveying literal meaning by
means of syntax, lexicon and phonology. An illocutionary act is the act of expressing the speaker's intention; it is
the act performed in saying something. A perlocutionary act is the act performed by or resulting from saying
something; it is the consequence of, or the change brought about by the utterance; it is the act performed by saying
something. For example:
You have left the door wide open.
The locutionary act performed by the speaker is that he has uttered all the words " you,' " have," " door," " left," "
open," etc. and expressed what the word literally mean.
The illocutionary act performed by the speaker is that by making such an utterance, he has expressed his intention
of asking the hearer to close the door.
The perlocutionary act refers to the effect of the utterance. If the hearer understands that the speaker intends him to
close the door and closes the door, the speaker has successfully brought about the change in the real world he has
intended to; then the perlocutiohary act is successfully performed .
51. Searle classified illocutionary act into five categories. Discuss each of them in detail with examples.
1) representatives: representatives are used to state, to describe, to report, etc.. The illocutionary point of the
representatives is to commit the speaker to something's being the case, to the truth of what has been said. For
example:
(I swear) I have never seen the man before.
(I state) the earth is a globe.
2) directives: Directives are attempts by the speaker to get the hearer to do something. Inviting, suggesting,
requesting, advising, warning, threatening, ordering are all specific instances of this class.
For example:
Open the window!
3) commissives: Commissives are those illocutionary acts whose point is to commit the speaker to some future
course of action. When the speaker is speaking, he puts himself under obligation. For example:
I promise to come.
I will bring you the book tomorrow without fail.
4) expressives: The illocutionary point of expressives is to express the psychological state specified in the
欢迎下载6 —utterance. The speaker is expressing his feelings or attitude towards an existing state of affairs, e.g. apologizing,
thanking, congratulating. For example:
I'm sorry for the mess I have made.
5) declarations: Declarations have the characteristic that the successful performance of such an act brings about the
correspondence between what is said and reality. For example:
I now declare the meeting open.
52. What are the four maxims under the cooperative principle?
The maxim of quantity
1. Make your contribution as informative as required (for the current purpose of the exchange) .
2. Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.
The maxim of quality
1. Do not say what you believe to be false.
2. Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.
The maxim of relation
Be relevant.
The maxim of manner
1. Avoid obscurity of expression.
2. Avoid ambiguity.
3. Be brief ( avoid unnecessary prolixity) .
4. Be orderly.
53. How does the flouting of the maxims give rise to conversational implicatures?
A: Do you know where Mr. Smith lives?
B: Somewhere in the southern suburbs of the city.
This is said when both A and B know that B does know Mr. Smith' s address. Thus B does not give enough
information that is required, and he has flouted the maxim of quantity. Therefore, such conversational implicature
as "I do not wish to tell you where Mr. Smith lives" is produced.
A: Would you like to come to our party tonight?
B: I'm afraid I' m not feeling so well today.
This is said when both A and B know that B is not having any health problem that will prevent him from going
欢迎下载7 —to a party. Thus B is saying something that he himself knows to be false and he is violating the maxim of quality.
The conversational implicature " I do not want to go to your party tonight" is then produced.
A: The hostess is an awful bore. Don't you think?
B: The roses in the garden are beautiful, aren't they?
This is said when both A and B know that it is entirely possible for B to make a comment on the hostess. Thus
B is saying something irrelevant to what A has just said, and he has flouted the maxim of relation. The conver-sational implicature "I don't wish to talk about the hostess in such a rude manner" is produced.
A: Shall we get something for the kids?
B: Yes. But I veto I - C - E - C - R - E - A - M.
This is said when both A and B know that B has no difficulty in pronouncing the word "ice-cream." Thus B has
flouted the maxim of manner. The conversational implicature "I donice-cream" is then produced.
’t want the kids to know we are talking about欢迎下载8
发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/web/1687610959a24521.html
评论列表(0条)