...Berger] Stochastic Interest Rates - A Crucial Correlation

...Berger] Stochastic Interest Rates - A Crucial Correlation

2023年6月24日发(作者:)

Stochastic Interest Rates:A Crucial Correlationo calculate the value of a stockoption, you need to model sto-chastic share prices. To deter-mine what a callable bond is worth,you must model stochastic interestrates. But to evaluate the options in-herent in a convertible bond—ahydra with one head fixed incomeand the other equity—you must treatboth the share price and the interestrates as stochastic variables function for valuation of con-vertible bonds, OVCV, is based on atwo-factor model that treats bothshare prices and interest rates as sto-chastic variables. And only by meansof a two-factor model can you effec-tively take into account the correla-tion between interest rates and because of developmental costsand the computing power needed torun a two-factor model, many con-vertible bond models attempt to makedo with a single factor, with interestrates held constant. Indeed, mostpractitioners believe that althoughMARKET SOLUTIONSBecause it ignores the difference the correlation effect can make

to net value, a single-factor model doesn’t quite get the job doneTFigure DO OVCV. Tab in, and enter 70 in the OASfield.

Press to see Diamond Offshore Drilling’s convertible bond valueusing stochastic interest rates makes

a calculation slightly more accurate,the net difference is not large and sonot worth the added complexity. Forexample, Michael Brennan and Ed-uardo Schwartz looked at the pricedifference between using constant

interest rates and stochastic ones forthe same convertible at various inter-est rates and concluded that “for areasonable range of interest rate lev-els the errors from the certain inter-est rate model are likely to be slight,and therefore, for practical purposesOVCV: A multitalented functionCORPI•••••n calculating the value of a convertible bond, the OVCV function models not only stochastic interest rates but alsoboth hard and soft calls, puts, and even dilution—à la warrants. In addition, it models dividends and creditspreads, and the advanced model even treats can use OVCV to:break a convertible’s value into its component partscalculate sensitivities on both the equity and interest-rate sides: vega, delta, gamma, duration, and convexitydetermine the implied values of share volatility or credit spreadprice dual-currency bonds, using interest-rate parity to calculate implied forward foreign exchange ratesplot graphs that show how values change under varying scenariosThe data needed for these calculations appear on wake-up, so there’s no need to search for or enter them: the yieldcurve, stock price, historical volatility, hard and soft calls, put schedules, and cash flows are all instantly offers you a powerful two-factor model and all the data needed to run it. No slide rule required.

—E.B. & ERGJuly 1997 91The correlation calculationo calculate the correlation between interest ratesand share prices, we must first understand exactlywhich variables we are trying to calculate the correlationof. To do that, we use the defining equations for the jointtwo-variable stochastic process:dS=

␮Sdt+

␴SdZ1

dr=

␮rdt+

␴rdZ2ᎏᎏSrHere

␴Sand

␴rare the (constant) volatilities of the twoprocesses and

␮Sand

␮rare their drifts. Under a risk-neu-tral measure,

␮S

= rand

␮rmatches the observed yieldcurve. The expressions dZ1and dZ2are increments of aunit Brownian motion, and it is the correlation of

␴SdZ1and

␴rdZ2that is needed. This is exactly the same as thecorrelation between dlog Sand dlog r—by Ito’s lemma.

We thus form the series xi

ϵ

log Si+1– log Siand yi

ϵ

logri+1– log ri

and calculate their correlation. The series xiisjust the log of the return. The sample mean and standarddeviation of xiareTThe correlation between the two series is thengiven by

␳xy

=

xi

␮xyi

␮y΋(n – 1).␴x␴yi=1Fortunately, you don’t have to calculate these cor-relations yourself; CORR calculates them for CORC 1 (if this slot is taken, use a num-ber other than one), and enter the data as in figure3. We have chosen USG1YL as a proxy for interestrates because, being a weighted average of bondswith maturities out to three years, it is less sus-ceptible to Federal Reserve control. It is also one ofthe indexes used in standard value-at-risk calcula-tions. Note how we use the differences in the logsin the correlation calculation by entering a Din thefirst column and an Ein the sixth type 2 to get the correlation matrix. Figure4 shows that the S&P 500 has a correlation close tominus 0.5, whereas the EMC convertible has a corre-lation of minus 0.294. —E.B. & D.K.͸n

␮x

= xi

΋n and

␴x

=

i=1͸n

i=1͸n

(xi

␮x)2΋(n – 1), may be preferable to use this sim-pler model [constant interest rate]for valuing convertible bonds” (“An-alyzing Convertible Bonds,” Journal ofFinancial and Quantitative Analysis15:4 [November 1980]).That claim may be correct for theprimary bond market, but it’s notgenerally valid in the secondary mar-kets. Take, for example, a bustedcallable convertible—a convertiblewhose share price is so far below itsconversion price that its conversionoption is almost worthless—that’spaying a coupon close to par in lightof the current yield curve. Such abond will behave exactly like a nor-mal callable bond, and to ignore sto-chastic interest rates in valuing sucha convertible would be as inaccurateas it would be in the normal callablebond as an investor in convertiblebonds, why should you care aboutsuch a bond? Because it’s busted andbehaves like a normal callable bond,you can leave it to the fixed-incomedepartment. After all, it isn’t reallyaconvertible bond now, anyway.92 July 1997 BLOOMBERGFair enough, except there’s moreto it than that. You need to model thestochastic interest rates because shareprice movements and interest-ratemovements are correlated and thecorrelation strongly affects the valu-ation. That point—that stochasticinterest rates are important because

of the correlation effect—seems tobe continually overlooked by re-searchers and by almost all get a sense of how importantthe correlation effect is, considerFigure 7 from the OVCVscreen. Tab down and enter –0.5

in the VOLAT. & YIELDCORRELATIONfield; press . Type

99

to recalculate the bond valuewhat happens in a two-factor modelif interest rates rise. As in the Black-Scholes equation, the risk-neutraldrift of the share value—whichequals the interest rate— means that future share pricesare expected to be higher, whichcauses the option value to increase,making the convertible worth everyone knows that when inter-est rates go up, the stock marketdrops. Here’s the rub: higher interestrates doimply that the share price willdrift up at a higher risk-neutral rate,but first it will drop sharply becauseof negative correlation with interestrates. Ignoring correlation, then, isnot a smart follows, therefore, that negativecorrelations should lower the value ofa convertible, whereas positive corre-lations should make it worth another way, a convertible’sfixed-income value is an average overall interest-rate scenarios, with highvalues when interest rates are low andwith low values when rates are positive correlation, the regionin which interest rates are high ismore than compensated for by thehigher share prices and thereforehigher conversion ’s how negative correlationlooks in practice: Diamond OffshoreDrilling issued close to half a billiondollars of 3.375 percent convertiblebonds due February 15, 2007. Run-ning OVCV with an option-adjustedspread of 70 basis points brings up avalue of $116.143 (figure 1). Increas-ing the yield volatility from 8.2 per-cent changes the price by only 11cents, to $116.251. This, of course,dovetails well with research thatclaims that a stochastic interest ratehas little effect on a bond’s let’s make a slight 7 , tab in to theVolat. &YieldCorrelationfield, and type–0.5

99 to recal-culate the value with a correlation ofminus 0.5 (figure 2).The price drops down to$109.618—a whopping $6.50 differ-ence and hardly insignificant. Rais-ing the correlation to plus 0.5 movesthe value up to $122.91, for a $13

difference between a correlation ofminus 0.5 and plus 0.5. On an issueFigure CORC1 , and modify the correlation matrix table as 1 to updateof $400 million, $13 translates intoyield volatility from 8.2 percent alters$52 bond price by only a few one would expect, most equitiesChanging the correlation to minushave a negative correlation with in-0.294, however, decreases the value byterest-rate movements. The Standard$2.50. On an issue of $450 million,& Poor’s 500-stock index has a corre-$2.50 translates into $11.25 million—lation of about minus 0.5, whereaswhich adds up to a very good reasonDiamond Offshore Drilling has a cor-to pay close attention to fluctuating in-relation close to zero. EMC Corp.,terest rates and the correlation also has a recent issue of al-most half a billion dollars’ worth of¬Any comments? Type MAGAZINE3.25 percent convertibles due March. For reprints of this article,15, 2002 (EMC3.25 02 ), hastype MAGZ .a correlation of minus 0.294 (figures3 and 4 and sidebar The CorrelationEric Berger, Ph.D., and

Calculation).David Klein, Ph.D., developed

In the EMC bond, changing thethe Bloomberg convertible bond modelCORPFigure 2 from the updated CORC1 screen to see the correlation

between interest rates, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, and EMC ERGJuly 1997 93

发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/xiaochengxu/1687605847a24058.html

相关推荐

发表回复

评论列表(0条)

  • 暂无评论

联系我们

400-800-8888

在线咨询: QQ交谈

邮件:admin@example.com

工作时间:周一至周五,9:30-18:30,节假日休息

关注微信