2024年5月18日发(作者：调整显示器亮度的步骤)

Dear …

Thank you for your very interesting paper '…' I think this topic would be of

considerable interest to international readers, who may be able to draw parallels

between your account from China and what they see in their own countries.

I have now received advice from two reviewers, and on the basis of their advice

I am not able, at this point, to go ahead with the publication of your paper.

Both reviewers saw merit in your study, and were generous in the advice and

suggestions that they provided. I encourage you to consider what they have to say,

and if you are able to accommodate their advice, I would welcome a resubmission

from you. I am, at this stage, unable to give a commitment to publication, but

should you submit a revised article, I will seek further advice through the normal

review process. I think there is a good chance that this process can lead to an

article that will be suitable to publish in ….

The comments made by the two reviewers are reproduced below…

Editor

Comments for the Author:

Reviewer #1: I enjoyed reading this article. It is a useful contribution to the

field of ...

In suggesting acceptance with the addition of corrections and further

explanation…

Anyway:

(1) More words need to be spent on describing …

(2) The prose is mainly good, but there are some patch-ups required:

p.1 motivates (3/4 way down)

p.1 interviews (1 line up from page bottom)

p.2 paragraph 4--"them" should be "students" in line 4 of that paragraph.

p.2 para. 5 towards end. "greater the likely and amount" needs re-writing

p.2 bottom line: 85% of respondents

p.3 block indented quotation. Get rid of quotation marks at beginning and

end, and for all other block indented quotations. They are redundant.

p.3 line 6 from bottom of page. Full stop following etc

p.4 line 15. amounts

p.4 line 23. entrance exams

p.5 nothing wrong with using word "guanxi" but in a bracket give a translation.

p.5 line 15. School B regretted sticking (get rid of "for"

p.5 line 20. pointed. The quotation from Lauder looks incorrect to me. Check it.

There is something wrong with "that good or credential". Perhaps it is ok--not

sure--check.

p.5 acronym--CMO--spell out. I will not point to all of these, but they need

repair.

p.6 11 lines up from bottom, 5% of its--this mistake is repeated

elswhere--insert the "of"

p.6 3 lines up from bottom. "purposes in sending"

p.7 line 15. pay a choice fee

p.7 Replace STS with actual words

p.9 EESMS--what is that?

p.10 line 3 with a masters degree

p.10 line 13 research--not researches