2024年5月4日发(作者:dlink路由器默认密码)
Cultures are one of those complex elements that result from a
combination of both intentional design and unintentional consequence of
cause and effect. Moreover, each culture is unique and often is made up
of subcultures of level, trade, tenure, ethnicity and even university
alumni.
For years I have been approached by individuals who say, “We need to
create a safety culture because we don't have one around here.” Often
these individuals do not realize that they likely already have a safety
culture at their workplace, just not the one they prefer. To transform an
organization into one capable of sustaining excellent performance in
safety, quality and other operational areas, it is ideal to begin by
assessing the current climate and culture. After all, it often is said, “A
culture is why we do what we do.”
Cultures most commonly are defined as common practices, shared
attitudes and perceptions that influence behavioral choices at work and
away. Experience has taught us that several things influence a culture,
such as location, leadership, supervisory styles, peer pressure,
workplace conditions and logistics, to name a few.
Through a coordinated assessment process, a safety culture can be
measured, and thus improved. After gaining a better understanding of
the assessment's significant findings, the critical few findings that have
the potential for the greatest transformational impact on improving the
site's safety culture are identified, prioritized and addressed. This article
provides a foundation to guide the reader through an internal
assessment of their site or company culture. These seven vital steps
have been followed hundreds of times throughout the world with great
success.
STEP 1 — REVIEW DOCUMENTATION, PROGRAMS AND
POLICIESFamiliarize yourself with documentation on current and past
programs, initiatives and previous audits. Further insight can be
provided by understanding the work order process, effectiveness of
communication channels, safety committee(s), incident investigation
process, incentives and rewards and recognition programs.
Consider performing a Pareto Analysis of the past 3-5 years' incident
reports. Look for the vital precautions that represent personal prevention
opportunities as a way to ground the data collected during the
assessment. In addition, consider identifying trends within commonly
collected variables that result from incident reports. An understanding of
the safety roles, responsibilities and expectations of those in leadership
positions provides insight into the support behaviors and safety
leadership onboarding norms within the organization. This information is
critical to provide an understanding of the cultural foundation and helps
you identify where to focus discussions and identify transformational
opportunities.
STEP 2 — COMMUNICATE PRIOR TO EMPLOYEE INTERACTIONThis is
your first opportunity to set a positive path for the culture assessment.
While to some it might not be perceived as valuable, sites that skipped
this step reported uncomfortable first experiences and guarded
responses.
Inform all within the organization of the activities of the assessment. Pay
special attention to ensure all that the discussions will be anonymous and
you only will be interviewed with your peers to allow for open and honest
discussions. This principle is critical to the process.
The employees will need to understand that the purpose of the
assessment is not to find fault, but to identify the opportunities to further
proactively improve. Several site leaders have closed with the following
statement: “I sincerely thank you in advance. Your feedback on the
strengths of and opportunities to improve our safety culture is the only
way we can ensure we are going in the right direction with our safety
improvement efforts.” Consider closing this step by validating
communication occurred, rather than simply assuming.
STEP 3 — CONDUCT A LOCATION WALKAs early as possible in the visit,
a site tour should be arranged. The tour should include the major (if not
all) areas of the site where work is in progress. The goal of the tour is to
give the assessor an overview of logistics, tasks and basic safety issues
involved in site processes. If the assessor is familiar with the location,
this tour can help provide an understanding of group and individual
behaviors and how they differ when individuals are working in teams or
alone.
STEP 4 — LEADERSHIP DISCUSSION
A half-hour briefing can be scheduled for management and key
personnel, if needed and feasible, to build awareness. This is the
opportunity to thank the leaders in advance for their support and to
ensure they are comfortable with the initiative. The goal is to discover
the facts about the culture and identify transformational approaches to
excellence. While they should be aware that this is a high priority, the
activities should not negatively affect operational activities. Moreover, it
is critical that they understand the assessment is not a fault-finding
process.
In organizations with represented work forces, it is critical to include the
elected bargaining unit leadership in the safety improvement
discussions/interviews. Unions typically consider safety one of their
highest priorities and will help ensure the success of accident-prevention
efforts as long as they have the opportunity to ensure these efforts do
not run counter to other objectives. This initial and continuous
involvement is an absolute critical success factor.
STEP 5 — UTILIZE A CUSTOMIZED SAFETY PERCEPTION SURVEY
While there are several off-the-shelf perception surveys available to
organizations, this author strongly encourages organizations to develop
their own. Generic perception surveys do not always measure the
intended perceptions. They gather information on general categories and
often miss out on specifics.
STEP 6 — CONDUCT GROUP & INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS
Measuring a culture involves a complex metric of perceptions, workplace
realities, past incident history and inter-connectivity of the people.
Perceptions are only a component of the answer, not the answer itself.
Current focus, definition of safety, communication effectiveness,
knowledge support, past history of successes and failures, support for
change and likes and dislikes are among the topics of discussion.
One-on-one interviews with key individuals can be used for obtaining a
deeper understanding of the information collected from the customized
safety perception survey. Focus groups can be comprised of a
representative sample of all levels, shifts and major tasks within the
organization. For smaller locations, the assessor is encouraged to speak
with the entire population. Focus groups participate in highly interactive
group interview sessions. They typically involve groups of no more than
10 people and are led by a trained facilitator. Focus groups generally
encourage interaction among participants. A well-led focus group tends
to yield extremely rich insight.
Ensure the group discussion occurs by-level to protect anonymity.
Standard safety culture interview questions should be used, but it is
common for an interview to deviate from the prepared questions to
explore responses in greater depth.
STEP 7 — PROVIDE A REPORT FOCUSING ON INTERNALLY ACTIONABLE
ITEMS
Most safety culture assessments are performed with the objective to
determine the nature, direction, perceptions and capabilities of the site
or company personnel as they work together to prevent accidents.
Additionally, the assessment should investigate organizational readiness
for both rapid and sustainable safety improvement, and aim to discover
factors that may facilitate or inhibit such improvement.
The author encourages the assessor to conduct an exit meeting with key
personnel on the last day of the assessment to discuss preliminary
findings (i.e., the general findings, factors that would support
improvement, factors that could challenge efforts and initial internally
actionable recommendations). Additionally, this session should address
how the current organizational, operational issues impact safety success
at the location. If the site has bargaining unit representation, the site is
encouraged (depending on relationship and openness) to involve the
union leadership in the closing discussions.
It is recommended that the final report focus on identifying internally
actionable transformational findings and be delivered within a relatively
short time frame following the completion of the on-site assessment
activities, so as not to lose momentum.
THE REPORT IS DELIVERED, WHAT NEXT?
Assessing the safety culture often provides valuable, actionable insight.
Consider integrating the steps mentioned in this article into your annual
review of effectiveness. The tactics to develop an understanding from the
many levels of an organization are usable in more than a structured
assessment. Involving people in change has proven to be more effective
than briefing them on resulting impact. Developing a culture, like
communication and effective leadership, is gained through a continued
journey, not an event.
I would like to offer a simple principle about cultures that has proven to
be helpful to organizations that have achieved excellence in multiple
operational categories. Your organizational culture is by far your most
effective safety sustainability mechanism. Moreover, the cultural
elements previously discussed have a far-reaching impact into the
personal lives of those within it.
Developing a culture that focuses on achieving safety excellence offers
principles to individuals that assist them in their personal quests to
remain injury-free throughout life. Most importantly, it has a positive
impact on the things most people care about more than anything in this
world: their family and their family's safety. With this in mind, what could
be a more noble cause than developing a culture of safety excellence?
Editor's Note: Part Two of this series will discuss the strategies to take a
safety culture assessment report and internally establish a culture of
safety excellence.
发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/xitong/1714808668a2519987.html
评论列表(0条)