2024年5月4日发(作者:磁力猫bt种子磁力搜索器)
US-China Foreign Language, September 2022, Vol. 20, No. 9, 330-334
doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2022.09.003
DAVID PUBLISHING
An Assessment of English Listening Test of
Senior High School Students
LI Yuhan, HUANG Fang
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
In this study, the reliability and validity of the listening section of a sophomore monthly examination paper in a high
school in Anhui Province were assessed and item analysis was conducted. The analysis revealed that the listening
test has low reliability but good validity. The listening test is simple and does not have a high degree of differentiation.
Most of the questions were not of high quality and the same type of questions appeared several times. In general, the
listening test is not satisfactory in all aspects except validity, and the quality of the questions should be further
improved to balance the reliability and validity and to improve the rationality of the listening test.
Keywords: listening assessment, reliability and validity, item analysis
Introduction
Listening tests have long occupied an important place in various types of English tests, and there have been
many scholars who have studied and evaluated different types of listening tests in various ways. There have been
studies on the backwash effects of listening tests on English teaching (Cao, 2009), investigations into the validity
of question types and listening tests (Wu, 2001), and studies on the effects of learners’ learning strategies on
listening performance (Zhou, 2000). However, most of the current research has focused on studies of college
English listening tests. There have been few assessments on the listening section of senior high school English
tests and the current research is not in-depth. Therefore, this paper will assess the listening section of the
sophomore monthly examination paper with a view to providing a reference for future content arrangement of
English listening tests in senior high schools.
Literature Review
English listening is an important part of English teaching and testing and has been studied by many scholars
in various ways. In terms of listening test validity, Wu (2001) studied the information processing process based
on multiple-choice listening questions and found that multiple-choice questions posed a threat to the validity of
the test paper. Some scholars have discussed the teaching methods of listening based on the nature and process
of English listening comprehension and the factors affecting listening comprehension (Wang & Miao, 2003). Dai
(2010) studied the role of task-based teaching methods in high school English listening and explored effective
ways of listening teaching in high school.
LI Yuhan, Master’s degree, College of Foreign Languages, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
HUANG Fang, Ph.D., College of Foreign Languages, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
AN ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LISTENING TEST
331
English listening tests are conducive to the improvement of students’ language communication ability and
listening teaching. However, the current listening teaching in senior high school mainly based on exercises,
ignoring the phased development of students’ listening ability (Dong, 2017). There are still many problems in
English listening teaching and listening tests in high school. Ping (2010) argued that in the stage of middle school,
emphasis should be placed on developing students’ listening foundation, which is essential for foreign language
learning, and that English listening tests are feasible and necessary. In the future, there should be more assessment
and research on high school listening tests to provide theoretical guidance on the content arrangement of listening
tests and to improve the rationality of listening tests.
The Study
This study adopts a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to assess a listening test on a monthly
examination for sophomore students in a secondary school in Anhui Province. The listening test consisted of 20
multiple choice questions, each with three options and only one correct answer, with each question being scored
out of two, for a total of 40 points. The first part of the test consists of five short conversations, with five questions.
The second part consists of five dialogues with 15 questions. This study investigated the reliability and validity
of this listening test, and an item analysis was conducted to investigate the rationality of the listening test paper.
Participants
A total of 1,080 students took this exam and a total of 117 students from two classes were selected for the
study in this experiment. Class One was the experimental group, with an overall grade ranking higher than Class
Two, and the actual number of participants in the exam was 61. Class Two was the control group and the actual
number of participants in the examination was 56.
Data Collection
In this study, the English test answer cards of 117 participants were collected and the data from the listening
test sections were entered into SPSS based on the responses on the answer cards. The data consisted of the scores
for each of the 20 listening questions, the total score for each section, and the total listening score.
Data Analysis
In this study, the listening scores of 117 participants were statistically analyzed, and the reliability, validity,
difficulty, and discrimination of the listening part were further analyzed.
After a descriptive statistical analysis of the 117 participants’ listening scores, the following results were
obtained. Table 1 show that the 117 participants scored a mean of 32.02, median of 32, mode of 36, SD = 5.43,
minimum score of 18 and maximum score of 40, and Range = 22.
Table 1
Mean, Median, and Mode of Listening Total Score
Statistics
Listening TS
N
117
Skewness
-0.617
Valid
117
Kurtosis
-0.508
Missing
0
Minimum
18
Mean
32.02
Maximum
40
Median
32.00
Mode
36
a
Notes. a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown.
332
AN ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LISTENING TEST
Skewness and kurtosis are within the range of -2 to +2, which conforms to the normal distribution. The
skewness value of -0.617 indicates that the majority of the participants scored above the mean, which is an initial
indication that the listening test was generally easy. Kurtosis value is -0.508, which shows that the gap between
the highest score and the lowest score is relatively large, which is consistent with the result of range.
Reliability
Statistical analysis was carried out after the data collection of the two sections. Through the statistical
analysis of SPSS, we first obtained the overall reliability of the listening test. The reliability values for the first
part and the second part of the listening test were further analyzed.
Table 2
Reliability Coefficient α of Section One and Section Two
Reliability statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha
0.604
N of items
6
As shown in Table 2, the reliability coefficient α = 0.604. The overall statistical results show that, in general,
the reliability of the listening test section of this paper is not satisfactory.
Table 3
Reliability Coefficient α of Section One
Cronbach’s Alpha
0.24
N of items
5
As shown in Table 3, the reliability coefficient α for Section One was much less than 0.9. So the five
questions in the first part are further counted; the first and fourth questions had a large impact on the reliability.
Therefore, they were removed and further statistics were carried out, and the reliability coefficient α for Section
One improved to 0.518.
Table 4
Reliability Coefficient α of Section Two
Reliability statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha
0.614
N of items
15
The reliability coefficient α = 0.614 for Section Two, as shown in Table 4, which is an increase compared
to Section One. After removing Questions 9 and 19, which had a negative effect on the results, and the reliability
coefficient α for Section Two increased to 0.620, but the results were still below the expected value.
Validity
In this paper, the validity of the listening test was analyzed using internal correlation and the results are
shown below. As shown in Table 5, the correlation between Section One and Section Two was 0.351, and the
correlation between the two parts and the total listening score was 0.612 and 0.956 respectively, p < 0.01, which
was statistically significant.
AN ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LISTENING TEST
333
Table 5
Correlations of Section One, Section Two, and Listening Total Score
Correlations
TSⅠ1
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
TSⅡ2
0.351
**
0.000
117
1
117
TSⅡ2
Listening TS
0.612
**
0.000
117
0.956
**
0.000
117
Note. **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The correlation between the two parts of the listening test was weaker, while the relationship between these
two parts and the total listening score was stronger. The relationship between Section One and the total listening
score is a positive weak to medium relationship, while the relationship between Section Two and the total
listening score is a positive strong relationship.
Item Analysis
In the statistical analysis of discrimination index, the 117 participants were ranked according to their total
listening score, with 39 participants in the top one third and 39 in the bottom one third, and 39 in the middle.
Table 6
Value of Discrimination Index
Discrimination index
DI(N3) = 0.10
DI(N6) = 0.21
DI(N9) = 0.28
DI(N7) = 0.38
DI(average) = 0.30
DI(N13) = 0.13
DI(N15) = 0.23
DI(N18) = 0.28
DI(N8) = 0.38
DI(N14) = 0.13
DI(N11) = 0.26
DI(N1) = 0.36
DI(N20) = 0.46
DI(N17) = 0.13
DI(N16) = 0.26
DI(N5) = 0.36
DI(N12) = 0.56
DI(N2) = 0.15
DI(N4) = 0.28
DI(N19) = 0.36
DI(N10) = 0.67
Table 6 shows the discrimination index values for these 20 listening questions. There were 12 questions
with a discrimination index value less than 0.35, accounting for 60% of the total number of questions, and only
Question 20, Question 12, and Question 10 had a better discrimination index value. Overall, these 20 questions
were not highly discriminatory, with an average DI of 0.30, which is less than 0.35. This has a significant impact
on the reliability of the listening test. Due to the limitation of the number of questions, the listening test of this
paper is far below the minimum standard of reliability in terms of the discrimination of these 20 questions, which
is also consistent with the results of the reliability coefficient value in the previous section.
Results
The results of the item analysis showed that the quality of most of the questions in the test itself was
unsatisfactory, with 80% of the questions not having a satisfactory level of facility value. The same types of
questions were repeated several times, and the content of the test was relatively homogeneous. In addition, the
overall discrimination index value of the questions was less than 0.35, which did not distinguish significantly
between top and bottom students and was not a good test of the differences in listening ability of students at
different levels. By conducting further independent sample T-test, it was found that students with higher school
334
AN ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LISTENING TEST
rank and lower school rank had no statistical significant difference between their listening score in this test. This
also further indicated that this listening test did not well reflect the variability between the listening abilities of
students with different levels of proficiency.
Conclusion
This study adopted a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to make a detailed analysis of the
listening section of the monthly high school English examination paper. The validity of the listening section was
found to be satisfactory, but the reliability was unsatisfactory, the differentiation was not significant, the quality
of the questions was not high, the same type of questions appeared frequently, and teachers neglected to explain
the listening section in class. In the future, the balance of reliability and validity in the arrangement of the content
of the listening test in high school should be paid attention to, the differentiation of the questions should be more
significant, and the content of the listening test should be reasonably arranged to better reflect the listening ability
of students and promote the cultivation of their listening ability.
References
Cao, Q. (2009). A study on the washback effect of CET-4 online listening test on college English teachers’ teaching. Foreign
Languages and Literature, 25(5), 164-168.
Dai, Y. F. (2010). The application of task-based teaching in senior English listening teaching under the new curriculum standard.
Modern Education Science, 27(6), 51-52.
Dong, L. Z. (2017). A study on the washback effect of college entrance examination English listening test. Foreign Language
Testing and Teaching, 7(1), 42-49.
Ping, K. H. (2010). The necessity and feasibility of listening test in college entrance examination. Theory and Practice of Education,
30(5), 17-18.
Wang, S. Y., & Miao, X. W. (2003). Theories and methods of English listening teaching. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language
Education, 25(4), 1-5.
Wu, Y. A. (2001). Question types and the validity of listening test. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 45(2), 127-135+160.
Zhou, Q. J. (2000). The influence of English listening learning strategies on listening—A survey of English listening learning
strategies and analysis of the results. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 23(3), 62-64+95.
发布者:admin,转转请注明出处:http://www.yc00.com/xitong/1714808453a2519950.html
评论列表(0条)